Same-sex
marriage has gained popular support in several countries such as Netherland,
Poland and some others. The proponents of same-sex marriage believe that it is
the time to stand up for their rights. They lead this movement by coaxing
everybody to tolerate this group; they even always try to convince the world
that this will harm nobody. However, should everybody swallow this mistaken
belief unquestioningly? On no account must everybody accept that belief, because
many people know, deep down, that same-sex marriage causes irreparable harm.
The first
premise of proponents of same-sex marriage is that they can be loving parents
as good as loving parents of heterogeneous families. It comes from a
supposition that the only thing children really need is love and they argue
that they can provide the unconditional-leaning love for their adopted
children. In this case, unfortunately, that basic assumption and all flowing
from it are false because love is not enough. Hence, it means that homogenous
families do harm the children. Children do best when raised by a married mother
and a father. It is within this environment that children are most likely to be
exposed to the emotional and psychological experiences they need in order to
thrive. Indeed, men and women bring diversity to parenting; each makes unique
contributions to the rearing of children that cannot be replicated by the
other. Proponents of same-sex marriage should understand that mother and father
are not simply interchangeable. Two women, probably, can both be good mothers,
but neither can be a good father. According to an American professional health
and family consultant Dr. Traysen , “Mother-love and father-love- though
equally important are qualitatively different and produce distinct parent-child
attachments. Either of these forms of love without the other can be
problematic.” Consequently, it is perfectly clear that what a child needs is
the complementary balance of parental love and same-sex parents, by all
accounts, cannot offer children this quality; they will give bad effects to the
children emotionally and psychologically.
Thus far
same-sex marriage activists have been claiming that marriage is just a way of
recognizing people who love each other and want to spend their lives together.
Therefore, same-sex couples claim that people should not vehemently deny their
right to marry like anyone else because it is definitely discriminatory. While
it is true that love is integral in marriage, same-sex couples, however, just misuse
the consensus to hide the fact that they have erroneous assumptions about
marriage. To be logical, if love and companionship were enough to define marriage,
then there would be no valid reason to deny unions of a child and an adult, or
a teenager and his or her aging parent, or even to groups rather than couples.
Furthermore, Canadian scholar Margaret A. Somervile said,” Through marriage our
society marks out the relationship of two people who will together transmit
human life to the next generation and nurture and protect that life.” It is
clear that homosexual relationships are not marriage because they simply do not
fit the minimum necessary condition for a marriage to exist and their
consequences are far more negative than positive. In addition, there is no
discrimination at all because considering the consequences are overwhelmingly
negative, everybody is legally barred from marrying children, close blood
relatives, or a person who is already married, or a person of the same sex. These
restrictions are applied equally to everybody and same-sex couples are just too
selfish to accept this logical argument.
Probably,
proponents of same-sex marriage are still questioning about what I mean exactly
by stating that homosexual relationships are harmful. According to medical
research that deserves careful study, homosexual men experience higher rates of
many diseases, including: human Papillomavirus (cervical and anal cancer),
hepatitis A, B, and C, gonorrhea, syphilis and HIV. Lesbian women, meanwhile, have
a higher prevalence of bacterial vaginitis, hepatitis C, HIV and some others.
Indeed, various research studies have shown that homosexuals have higher rates
of alcohol abuse, drug abuse, nicotine dependence, depression and suicide. On the
other hand, pro-homosexual activists claim that discrimination is the main
cause of those mental health problems. They believe that same-sex couples would
experience less mental health problems in areas like San Francisco and
Netherland where homosexuality has achieved the highest level of acceptance. In
fact, that assumption reflects otherwise. In places in which homosexuality is
widely accepted, the physical and mental health problems of homosexuals are
greater, not less. This suggests that the real problem lies in the homosexual
lifestyle itself, not in society’s response to it. Consequently, those problems
will lead to more medical claims and higher insurance premiums. This is
hazardous to government and society as a whole.
All in all, the
idea of same-sex marriage brought by those illogical activists spreads like
wildfire across the world and it will ruin the nature of marriage and family.
It brings negative effects overwhelmingly as what they believe as a marriage
simply does not fit the notion of civil marriage in its truest sense and they,
indeed, are prone to physical diseases as well as mental illness according to
various studies; there is no reason on earth how they will be able to rear
children successfully. Thus, we should not easily swallow their ideas and we
should protect our families from this unprecedented disaster in the history of
mankind.
By: M.Bintang Arrival
Public Argumentation
No comments:
Post a Comment